page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42

False 17past horizons VIEWPOINT R ecently, the concept of a ‘ holistic’ approach to archaeology seems to be appearing on an ever- increasing scale, or perhaps it was always there and I am just becoming more aware of it. This holistic approach looks beyond the traditional boundaries of archaeology and stands up and reaches out of the trench, talks to the tourist and the local, views the wider landscape, appreciates the wildlife, listens to stories and acknowledges cultural heritage. The basic interpretation of holistic is one that emphasizes the importance of the whole and the interdependence of the various parts, and there is no escaping the ‘ human’ angle of archaeology when it deals with mental, emotional, spiritual, physical and social factors. It then becomes a part of society itself rather than working in isolation. Two recent ventures that I have been involved in have taken this holistic approach. The Griffon Vulture Project on the Croatian Island of Cres asked us to survey an area that clearly had an abundance of archaeology, but it was also an area of natural beauty, bio- diversity, and a working landscape ( see Page 8). Each element carried its own weight, and in this particular case, none had prominence over the other. It was interesting to talk with the project director, Goran Susic, and see his obvious passion for this diverse approach. I was, for the fi rst time, able to scientifi cally survey a mediaeval farmstead and prehistoric tomb complex, while simultaneously appreciating the mist seeping through the oak forest and the rare orchids growing by the roadside, as well as the Roman road itself. It seemed natural to both record the complex relationships between walls, tracks and settlements while a farmer called his sheep to feed in the same landscape. In this way, it was possible to see how each aspect was individually important, while forming part of what can be described as the total experience. In this instance archaeology will be part of the visitors’ interaction with the landscape as a whole, rather than being the sole attraction. The Cousland Big Dig in Scotland has also transformed my understanding of heritage projects, with a realisation that the basis for this venture was not just about the collection of data, it was also about community participation. The village already has a strong sense of identity, but here, I am participating in a series of events, where all ages and abilities can come together and share company, experience, rain, sun, wind, mud, clay – and there was as much excitement at fi nding a baby owl in the undergrowth as there was at uncovering an 18th century windmill. The group feeling of working together in the rain within a small woodland, was enhanced by a collective desire to share the space with others. Archaeology is a fabulous gateway that can open onto a whole range of possibilities that include teaching, physical activity, art, poetry, storytelling, bio- diversity, farming, tourism, social responsibility... the list is endless. The holistic approach, therefore, seems to be a sign of things to come, and promises a much richer experience of archaeology for those who choose to explore their heritage. ? ? David Connolly, BAJR When archaeology is not the whole story

False past horizons18